Layering views at the center of the universe

 


Hello, bloggers...  Richard Speer here, your handy-dandy blog editor...

As you may know, Nancy Ellen Abrams, co-author of the book A View from the Center of the Universe, has been in an ongoing dialogue with Matt.  Matt is a fan of the book, and Nancy is a fan of Matt's painting.

Recently Nancy wrote Matt and remarked on the ways in which he layers metaphysical content within his paintings.  In part, she wrote:

“I've been wondering for a long time how to visually represent layering a consciousness of exotic size scales beneath (above, within—not sure of the preposition) the everyday consciousness we all have to function in.  ‘Thinking cosmically’ means that most of the time we are not really focusing on galactic or atomic size scales, yet we are nevertheless always aware that the everyday world is visible on just a narrow range of the size scales on which the universe exists. This awareness keeps us connected us to our larger selves and gives us the perspective to act more wisely in all our affairs.  I'm not sure anyone can figure out how to paint this.”

Matt responds:

Nancy, I’m reading your book for the third time here in Ireland.  Whenever I get into a book I have to read it at least 3 or 4 or 5 times.  I put the book in different places in our house and then pick it up for an hour or two at random and read very carefully.

The first two times, the way I read, is that I skip things I can’t understand the first time.  The second time maybe I understand a little bit more.  The third time I liken it to a great banquet or smorgasbord where I come in and say, Okay, I’m only going to have the greatest salad and the greatest dressing, and nothing else.  Then the next day I come back, and it’s all fresh, and that day I’ll only have the soup.  I devour it very slowly so it sinks into my psyche and becomes part of the mishmash of my thought processes.

With regard to metaphysical content and layering, I refer to Joseph Campbell as one of my great heroes.  Swedenborg is another great visionary, and of course there is a rich history of religious writers and theologians.  To me it’s like a big blender, blending it all together and trying to make sense out of it.

As I said before, I think your book is a chalice of knowledge and insight, which I find I have to sip gingerly to get the full taste and meaning of the ingredients.  It’s challenging, but it’s also very fulfilling to see paterns emerging of where, individually and collectively, we are going.

And when you talk about the myths:  how myths are knitted together into one grand plan that all parts of mankind can participate in...  This is what I see as the culmination of my calling for the New Los Alamos, when people of different skills come together and figure out how we can in real, actual practive have a peaceful earth...

Thank you and your co-author for weaving together your story about the coming together of the cosmos.  It will be one more great mystery that I will have to ponder, and I’m sure it will find its way into some part of my painting in the future.  As the old saying goes, what goes around, comes around.

Matt 

Related posts

Comments

August 4. 2008 14:06

wonderful things spoken by both of you, thank you.


Nancy,
I recently came across a process with glazing on clay which may at least begin to touch on what you are seeking to make visual. I think it can be done with paints as well, particularly if you do an INK mix (transparent) over the top. There are large groups of painters who call themselves "layerists" and who may be able with the right colors and transparent inks and paints, etc to do what you are saying.
On the top, closest to you, would be the specifics, if any images were involved, ormaybe just mottled specks or something -- the every day... and below this, also visible would be more intricate designs and color intricacies... and beneath this perhaps another laye as well.... and all quite textured, as the ins and outs of awareness are like that --- this moment I tend to the matter before me, and the next moment the "cosmic" realities expressed there......

I think it's possible to "paint" it. I know it is possible to DO it.

There is also the possibility of physical layers --- like rice paper or fine lace, some sort of screening on top, and an inch or so below is a textured painting --- perhaps flower petals or some sort of seeds could be semi-free-floating between the two, again reflecting the ins and outs of awareness.

Just off-the cuff thoughts/ideas here: simple and practical material ideas after tending to the cosmic sensitivities in your question and Matts response.

thanks again

wondering Matt and Nancy if you have read Teilhard de Chardin? another hero in this regard --- also banned reading by the church for a time.....

anirose

August 4. 2008 14:25

another thought -- less practical, more ehtereal or something, maybe cosmic.

Nancy, you spoke of the everyday space which we "HAVE TO" function within.

In my thinking about the in and out process of awareness, going back and forth in a dynamic manner between the material and the spiritual -- or in your language the specific and the cosmic --- it is kind of important to not create a hierarchy. I mean, the cosmic is not MORE essential to our being than the specific. They are equally essential. The mystical awareness is not MORE essential than the practical. Both are necessary to understand the other. It is process and the dynamic relationship which is MOST important. Matter is engaged in becoming spirit, while at the same time spirit is engaged in becoming matter. What comes around as a result will be a new dynamic... the all-at-once-ness... ONE-ness, etc. We don't yet have a clue what this truly means but we are going in that direction. In other words again, darkness is not evil while Light is good. Black is not bad. Shadows are not negative. We NEED our shadow side in order to integrate fully what light is all about. We could not understand shadow with out light. They are each integral and equally essential. It is the process, the dynamic relationship in which we engage them -- that is key.

I bless the particulars, the tiny matter and specific moments because they ARE the vessel within which I process and grow. They ARE the earthen vessel which fully expresses all other possibility- as if they are not separate.

I think this is the point of Jesus. In terms of myth and dreamtime, we HAVE TO HAVE and MUST HONOR the specific man, it was necessary for all the "christ" characters of myth -- to be REAL, of matter, historical. They just couldn't tell us the message of OUR possibilities from a distance.

Body Mind --- I don't think they are meant to be separated -- like dark and light, like matter and spirit, like specific and cosmic.

The dynamic engagement brings them TOGETHER, rather than thinking we "have to" deal with one until the other comes around. It's miraculous what we have in front of us -- each atom and particle a vessel of true god................ like we each are as well.

yeesh what a sermon. I hope I did not misunderstand what you meant in the words, "have to."

anirose

Add comment


 

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

January 7. 2009 02:16