"It takes a village..."

In response to Matt’s challenge to come up with a first step toward world peace, a reader remarks that “it takes a village to raise a child” and suggests that closer supervision of children by their families and communities would result in more well-adjusted young people.  Further, the reader believes that schools should teach subjects until students understand them, even if it takes a long time, so that they do not become discouraged, leading to low self-esteeem, leading potentially to violent behavior.  Matt responds:  

Thank you for the great observations.  My grandchildren started out in Montessori schools, which have a very open, inquisitive, free-flowing way of presenting the schoolwork.  I think it served them well when they made the transition from that environment to the environment we have today, because they were able to experience the best of both worlds:  individuality and standardization.  I think also it enables children to be who they really are, by whatever standards their personalities direct them, without being overly concerned about whether they’re offending the crowd, or joining the crowd just for the sake of conformity.  It’s an individualistic approach to a communal society.

I believe your observation about people being isolated within the home is very real.  Whenever I’m traveling around the world, I always see news footage of all these horrendous events of American students going on shooting rampages at their schools.  I don’t know what it really says about our society, but it’s got to say something, because although this phenomenon does happen in other countries, it doesn’t occur as repeatedly as it does within the U.S.  It may be that it comes from feelings of loneliness, despair, no hope, not being able to associate with family or friends, bullying, intolerance, making fun of kids...

We started a program awhile back, which unfortunately didn’t take off the way I hoped it would, due to lack of personnel.  But the essence of it was, “Be good to the fat, cross-eyed dummy; don’t beat the hell out of him; give him a hug and help him any way you possibly can.”  I think that isolation within a school is a major problem:  the concept of the lonely crowd.  We are constantly surrounded by people chatting, laughing, seemingly having a wonderful, communal time, and we don’t feel we’re part of it.  It might be the process of “birds of a feather flocking together.”  It seems to me that the integration of the flock is much more healthy, because then you avoid the us-versus-them attitude. When an individualistic person, who doesn’t march to the same drummer, becomes an outcast, is shunned, becomes the butt of jokes, they often fall through the cracks.  Maybe there’s a breaking point where they feel the only way they can make a statement is to do something violent and irrational.  I’m no psychiatrist, but it seems to me we have to encourage everyone to be more open and attuned to what’s going on around them, and leave everybody alone as far as their idiosyncrasies.  Invite them to the table!  So they eat their peas with a knife instead of a fork?  Who gives a shit?

So I think you’re on the right track.  How do we implement that, though?  If we wait around for someone to come to the rescue and tell us, we may be dead and in our graves before we find the answer.  I always think we should get busy making the solution, and then if some aspect of the solution is broken, then fix it.  That’s why they put erasers on pencils.  Come to think of it, a lot of pencils don’t have erasers anymore.  Maybe that’s part of the problem:  We’re afraid to do anything to chance that we may make a mistake.  Make mistakes and learn from them!  Give us back our erasers! 

Matt

Comments

March 23. 2008 05:32

schools. oy. My soapbox would be very long on that subject. My kids have also experienced the variety, gharter school, regular school, home-schoole too (in mexico). It has come down to ME as the parent helping them to have open minds, and independent thinking. question everything. remember a theory is ONLY a theory. (gravity is a theory. even einstien said it's really a side-effect of other theoretical events int he cosmos).it is more important to know HOW to make a decision than to have made up your mind about everything.
Anyway --- i have an art piece which is unfinished - as i am still thinking the subject through... it has some clay pieces, about 7 inches, which resemble rebellious teen boys, leaning against a wall, baseball hat on backwards, long face, hige low pants, hands in pockets, etc. There are also two sitting low to the ground, hands to face or arm up over head in a crouching, low, "victim" stance, also a teen boy repesentation (not detailed yet you can tell). And one on his knees with angry arms in air. I have set them up against and around paper lockers which have words on them like, "lonely", "sucker" "stupid" "alone" "afraid" etc... The unfinshed piece is how to use mirrors. My point with this piece is not to focus on how the young "killers" Feel. My point is to put some responsibility back on the onlooker.

There are indigenous peopls, and early christian ones, which had rituals whereby teh "criminal" or "sinner" was put in the center of the village - to be heard, given attention, and apologized to. It was those AROUND him/her who would ear ashes and try to figure out what they had done WRong to cause this person to stray away from communal values.

It's just a little different than the system of jails, scho9ols and discipline, and the way we THINK ABOUT, "those who do wrong" now - in the US, I think, Esepcially.

I have some responsibility if young people in my life, that i have seen regularly and had chances to talk with, are totally lost. If they end up killing others and then themsleves I MUST look to myself -- and not just stop the process by trying to figure out what was wrong with THEM.
They ARE the art piece for american school. They express where it's at, they cause disruption, and the challenge to something ELSE.. or MORE.

so what is the first step there? How do we implement it? One piece of the campaign HAS to be that, "it starts with me." I have reponsibility to and for those around me. I understand I am so utterly independent I can't even fathom how much I effect those around me -- and I need to take ntoice. I need to accept my part in the whole system. It's fucked up. And I am somehow a part of that. I have looked the other way. I have shaken my head and gone on. I have seen a young kid and not smile or gone out of my way to say hi. I have NOT done lots of things.....

No part of our art is a mistake -- right? it happens the way it happens when we mix textures and such -- and we accept it, and we learn and kee moving - chagne it, or take it and do another.. whatever. Well these young people are the art. They are not mistakes. They are part of the mix. And so am I.

When I finish and show this one art piece, I'll have one conscious act towards my own responsibility to these yougn men who have shot friends and strangers and killed themselves - and others who think abotu doing it. Hopefully by then I will have more ideas too.

Here is one - and I am seriously cosidering it... There are a couple - only - of decent "political art" websites out there. Perhaps we could start a.... world concern art website -- have open calls, exhibits, ... specifically about concerns liek this, specifically asking for action as PART of exhibits -- part of being an artist participating, and part of proceeds, and part of comers and onlookers requirement too... you want to see it? first sign this or that petition, give a dollar or ten thousand to ... find a single person today to... and then tell us about it.... some sort of "activity" would be a necessary aspect of the whole experience -- even "just" viewoing the art -- which is the point. Dont just look -- SEE!

hmm .. call it... "see the world" (pseudo pun is an addition to the meaning).

Anji Rose

Add comment


 

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

July 4. 2008 01:32